|
| Adobe Indesign CS3 Upgrade from Pagemaker | 
 enlarge | From: Adobe
Category: Software
This item is no longer available
Avg. Customer Rating:  5 reviews
Sales Rank: 3875
Format: Dvd-rom
Platforms: Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows Vista Business, Windows Vista Enterprise, Windows Vista Ultimate, Windows Xp
Media: DVD-ROM
Edition: Standard - Upgrade from PageMaker Edition
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Shipping Weight (lbs): 3
Dimensions (in): 7.9 x 5.8 x 1.7
MPN: 27510889
Model: 27510889
UPC: 883919088266
EAN: 0883919088266
ASIN: B000NDIC40
Release Date: April 20, 2007
|
| Customer Reviews:
 InDesign Upgrade October 17, 2008
Since many printer no longer support PageMaker, the next choice for layout software is InDesign. It is nice to be able to purchase an upgrade rather than pay full price. The program loaded nicely and is more comprehensive than PageMaker.
Don't Upgrade If You Do Books September 26, 2007
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
If you use InDesign for books requiring indexes, do NOT upgrade to this version. InDesign CS3 (for both Windows and Macs) has serious problems with indexing multi-document books that does not exist in CS2. It drops entries and scrambles page numbers seemingly at random, while giving no warning that something has gone wrong. Any index it produces cannot be trusted. Imagine a publisher printing 50,000 copies of a book with a defective index and you get a sense of just how dreadful this problem is. Adobe could be sued for a flaw this serious.
This bug was reported on Adobe forums back in late April, five months ago. I've talked to Adobe programmers and staff about it. They can't do any more than suggest a script that combines multiple documents into one, where the problem apparently doesn't exist. The real fix is awaiting upper management approval of a "point-release," which must mean the CS3.1 version. But this fix doesn't require a point-release. Every few weeks, Adobe's updater patches CS3 for some trivial reason, typically tweaking Adobe Bridge to sell more stock photos. They could do the same with this dreadful index bug.
Adobe CS3 contains quite a few improvements that make the upgrade worthwhile for most users. But if you create indexes from multidocument books, I suggest you wait until this problem is fixed before upgrading. That's why I gave it three stars rather than five. And if you don't hear otherwise, that means InDesign CS3.1.
--Michael W. Perry, author of Untangling Tolkien: A Chronology and Commentary for The Lord of the Rings
Still struggling August 2, 2007
6 out of 6 found this review helpful
I have been a PageMaker user FOREVER beginning on my little Mac back in the 1980s (I am now on a Dell). I hated to give it up but when I lost the ability to save my PageMaker 7.0 files as pdf (thanks to installing and then removing a trial version of Adobe Professional 8) I had to switch. The company who prints my 40 page bi-monthly agriculture magazine said it was about time!
Yes, there are some similarities between PM and ID but there are so many "bells and whistles" in ID that I will definately need to be trained on this program. I converted my PM file with very little problem (a few font issues but fixable once I found instructions on Adobe's Web site) and do find a few things in ID nice to use (i.e., the gradiant feature). I guess my middle of the road rating is that the learning curve is a little higher than with PM. I also miss some things in PM that ID doesn't appear to do, but they're minor touches I had grown accustomed to over the years.
One warning...it is a memory hog for sure! It is slow to load (I have 1 GB of RAM running on a 1.86 GHz Pentium processor Dell laptop) and bogs the computer at times when running other programs with it (i.e., Photoshop).
I am optimistic, though, that I will come to enjoy ID almost as much as I loved PM (I even tried using QuarkExpress many, many times and always came back to PM)! Good luck!
 moving up to InDesign CS3 July 12, 2007
9 out of 9 found this review helpful
I've been a long term PageMaker user and owned every version from 1.0 upwards to 7.0. So it was always going to be a hard thing to make the change to anything else. I bought InDesign mainly because I was getting problems with the more demanding DTP jobs that required separations, as well as feeling that more of what I created separately in Corel really ought to have been part of my main layout program. However, within a week of starting to use InDesign, I feel quite at home. There's enough carry-through to make life seem familiar, but loads of new intuitive functionality. It's early days, so I'm sure I'll find some limitations later, but they haven't appeared yet.
 Installation Problems Prevent a Review... June 27, 2007
2 out of 5 found this review helpful
I would love to review Adobe InDesign CS3, but I can't get the program to install on my new Vista system. Adobe technical support requested that I send them a conguration file, but its been almost a week and I haven't received a call back. Having used PageMaker for years, I look forward to using InDesign, but Adobe obviously needs to make some improvements.
|
|
|
Mysoftwareoutlet | Dvdunleahsed | Vistashack | Mygamer | Mostdef | Gameunit | |
